@𝗝𝗮𝗸𝗼𝗯 :𝗳𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮: 🇦🇹 ✅
Wie viele Nutzer hast du denn auf deiner Instanz laufen?
Also ich hab gerade mal 3 aktive und einer davon ist ein Bot.

Die Datenbank war auch immer das Problem von der Größe.
Ich habe dann die Avatar Bilder nicht mehr in der Datenbank gespeichert (das war irgendeine Einstellung) und dann wurde die immer kleiner und kleiner.

Ich vermute mal daran wird es wohl liegen, das #friendica so langsam reagiert, oder wurden irgendwelche Indizes nicht oder nicht so ganz glücklich gesetzt Aber dazu kann ich nichts sagen, das ich da noch nie nachgeschaut habe.

Habe das nur in anderen großen Arbeitsprojekten festgestellt, das dies manchmal wunder gewirkt hat.
Hier könnten wohl nur die erfahrenen Entwickler was dazu sagen.

@Friendica Support@Friendica Developers

Let me start with a concrete, question: Are there any efforts / plans to support the upload of videos?

And now, since I might have your attention, allow me to broaden the question to:

What is your opinion regarding "what #Friendica is / should be"?

My view / vision is heading slightly in the direction that nowadays image and video content is quite central in social networks and thus a #Fediverse application like friendica should support the multimedia aspect a bit more, if it wants to be attractive for the broad public in terms of being an alternative to commercial social networks.

Most of you might tell: "Yeah, if one prefers media centric Fediverse, then check out #pixelfed ". But I think, pixelfed is yet too much of an Instagram clone, only providing the image / video focus (which bothered me at Instagram from the very beginning not being able to have good commenting / discussion options there).

In my view, Friendica has great potential becoming a great "one fits all" application for the majority of people who like social media and the concept of the Fediverse. It has way more cool functions than #mastodon / pixelfed (which are in my opinion too close copies of Instagram and Twitter, respectively) but much simpler and convenient than Hubzilla (which I think is really great, for a computer science person, but not for the broad non-technical focussed public)

Wrapping it up: I would love to see a Friendica development towards an easier multimedia support. What are your thoughts?

Cheers

Marek

return [
        'phpmailer' => [
                // smtp (Boolean)
                // Enables SMTP relaying for outbound emails
                'smtp' => true,

                // smtp_server (String)
                // SMTP server host name
                'smtp_server' => 'mail.runbox.com',

                // smtp_port (Integer)
                // SMTP server port number
                'smtp_port' => 25,

                // smtp_secure (String)
                // What kind of encryption to use on the SMTP connection.
                // Options: '', 'ssl' or 'tls'.
     

@Friendica Admins
Hello,
I am just learning how to administer a PHP application. I have run into a problem. In general, I activated the addon through the admin panel, on the server, edited the file phpmailer.config.php. However, sending still doesn't work. Can you please tell me if I need to do something else to make it work? I'm attaching the config.

return [
        'phpmailer' => [
                // smtp (Boolean)
                // Enables SMTP relaying for outbound emails
                'smtp' => true,

                // smtp_server (String)
                // SMTP server host name
                'smtp_server' => 'mail.runbox.com',

                // smtp_port (Integer)
                // SMTP server port number
                'smtp_port' => 25,

                // smtp_secure (String)
                // What kind of encryption to use on the SMTP connection.
                // Options: '', 'ssl' or 'tls'.
                'smtp_secure' => 'ssl',

                // smtp_port_s (Integer)
                // Secure SMTP server port number
                'smtp_port_s' => 465,

                // smtp_username (String)
                // SMTP server authentication user name
                // Empty string disables authentication
                'smtp_username' => 'admin@friendica.city',

                // smtp_password (String)
                // SMTP server authentication password
                // Empty string disables authentication
                'smtp_password' => '*******************',

                // smtp_from (String)
                // From address used when using the SMTP server
                // Example: no-reply@example.com
                'smtp_from' => 'admin@friendica.city',
        ],
];

The #Diaspora project is what it is, but I really like the Diaspora protocol separation between authorship and ownership. In this model, the original poster is the rightful owner of all the replies that gets published in the thread they started. They are responsible with distributing replies to the original recipients, whether they follow each other or not, and can even delete replies as they see fit, and the deletion is propagated as well.

This avoids the current #Mastodon behavior where in a Follower-only conversation, each individual recipient may only see the original poster's replies to other people which own replies they didn't receive because they aren't following them.

With #ActivityPub, is there a way out of this half-private message, half-group conversation situation where only the original poster has a comprehensive view of limited privacy threads?

I wanted to publish a personal posts to my mutuals only which #Friendica allows, but I realized that any reply to it might not be visible to the other thread recipients, which means my own subsequent replies would be confusing for anyone's not directly following the person I'd reply to. And this has prevented me from actually writing my post.