#pvp #pvponline #humor #nft #computer

Yesterday, @˗ˏˋ wakest ˎˊ˗ gave me a compelling alternate narrative for #NFT as patronage rather than speculation vessel or multi-level marketing scam. Patrons pay for the art to be made but it can still be published publicly. Unlike Patreon, artists don’t have to hide anything behind a paywall.

Granted, it isn’t the most popular narrative, both in volume of money exchanged and in volume of interest on social media, but it has a faint redeeming quality to it that I enjoy.

Beyond the ridiculous pyramid scheme of #NFT, not sure the "let's show NFT is good actually by expressly going against the personal wishes of the creator of a graphics software we've been using without giving them credit" is the smart play. 🤮
https://twitter.com/secondrealm/status/1449897775496409088

Do not buy NFT made with my art.
Do not make NFT with my Creative-Commons artworks.
If you respect my art, remember and apply this.

Here is my article about what just happened: https://www.davidrevoy.com/article864/dream-cats-nfts-don-t-buy-them

#NFT #NFTCommunity

What I find amusing (as a #Wikipedia and #OSM contributor) that the #NFT does not even give you "intellectual property" (aka. ©) rights, so, basically you own something you may not even possibly have in possession or show to others.

I see a huge market in selling others' digital "goods" as "originals" to clueless people, using fake celebs names, cash in bitcoin and diappear until next time. Possibly can't even jail me since I have stolen nothing, and provided the "goods" as well. Criminals' heaven!