Skip to main content

i would kiil this person...
“It’s a very old one called my hands and own talent”
Yep. #AI not only steals artists work, it devalues it.
#AI
“Actual intelligence. You should try it.”
Non mais son premier réflexe a VRAIMENT été de se dire que c'était fait par une IA ? 🤦‍♀️
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuugh. why are people?
Probably hasn't ever used Krita -- has no idea who you are.
This person misses the Blockchain and NFT hype things 🤦‍♂️
bunch of assholes. Im sorry
Grins with cat teeth: »I don’t need an AI for this.«

(better: »One to whom you can actually explain your wishes. For 300€¹ I’ll show you.«)

¹: guess. Insert the actual cost of your image when paid fairly.
Hi David. Have you tried to block those blokes by a filter?

You might even use the phrase to make it more precise.

My recomondation would be to put a filter in place with the web-app (https://framapiaf.org/filters hopefully gets you there directly). In my experiece this is the easiest way to create and manage them.

Hope that helps. Enjoy the day and please do not let people like her/him get to you (easier said then done, I know. My whish and hope is to be able to cheer you up). 😘
@madiko
Looking at the screenshot makes me believe it's from the birdsite.

@davidrevoy you know that you have a loyal community over here. Since the owner switched there, the ratio of trolls increased. I'm aware that the network has value for marketing. But don't let that drag you down.
@madiko Yes, thank you for the advice :blobcatheart: , but it was on the birdsite as mentioned by @RyunoKi.

True Ryuno-Ki, Thanks. Yes, I archived my Twitter data, removed all people from "my follow" that I could find here on Fediverse, and just kept my Tw account as a (RSS) relay to post the main news now (yes, for the visibility of my project).

True, I should be more prepared to receive comments from Posthumanism/AI Take Over, NFTs, Crypto, and all the baggage that come with that.
@RyunoKi

Yes, you are right. I should have read a little more carefully.

Anyway: Good success with "Pepper&Carrot". I really love them and wish you all the best.
oof thats tough 😬
Wow, this is utterly heartbreaking. 😣

I'd probably react really pissed to these people answering like "it's called skill and talent, b**ch". Would change nothing though...
oof ouch this hurts
gotta be troll bait... 😑
Haha complimenting in 2022 👍
@jeko:shibalaugh: haha, I guess I have to see the glass as half full. Maybe it's a compliment.
@Jeko
very cute picture. really, really like it. :yayblob:
@roelfrenkema@theropologist

It's not built-in and not supported by official team working at Krita Foundation. You can find Stable Diffusion as a plugin made by someone externally to the team.
https://github.com/w4ffl35/krita_stable_diffusion

It requires downloading the model of the AI separately, and you'll need an account.

Stable Diffusion/LAION model is not Free/Libre and Open-Source compatible. It's a form of Open-Source with many rules on the top to prevent "AI Take Over" and unethical usage (how ironic).
In the future, it will be a complement to be compared to an AI.

"Wow, you made this? It looks like it came out of an AI!"
@Joseph_of_Earth I think you are right about it. The same than when a street portraitist with charcoal finishes a piece nowadays and people around them tell "it looks like a photo" as a compliment. I guess when photo appeared, it wasn't well received to compare a painting to a photo.
I think it's a difference in kind. If an artist is going for photo-realism, I can imagine it being a compliment to have your work be compared to a photo. In a material sense you can argue that photos are the ultimate way to capture a picture of the world.

To be compared to AI as a compliment implies that AI has a high level of skill, and you are good when measured up against that level of skill. I will be sad if AI becomes the ruler we use to measure quality in art.
But also I am not artistic so this is all very armchair analyst of me to say!
@Joseph_of_Earth Hey, it's fine and totally a rich discussion. Totally a good point about photo. 👍
fwiw when I saw it the other day my 1st reaction this image was, 'this is a true artist, no AI could have ever done this.'
...and I just discovered your webcomic 😲😍
un ignare consommateur de betises sur le net ; en somme une ia tres forte pour generer des conneries .... c'est frequent ...
This gets a follow from me. Keep making your great art my friend.
Could be worse at least it's cool.
Est-ce que c'est pas flatteur ? 😬
@alicesutaren 🥛 En voyant le verre à moitié plein, et après une soirée pépouze à me relaxer, et un peu de recule. Oui. Un peu. 🤣
: artificial intelligence is not a good substitute for human stupitidy…
This is pretty sad
Answer "the same A.I. you use to ask your question… But I probably tweaking mine better than yours"
This scenario is what the word “fuckwit” is for.
Someday you'll have to add "no AI" like we see "no NFT" artists.
@LilaTequila Yes, I guess we are going into this scenario.
Disheartening, I'm sorry. 😑
This is such a sad joke by this person. I love this art. I'm growing so tired of all this AI bullshit.
That sounds like deliberate trolling, to be honest.
I think most commenters are overreacting here. They likely never heard of Krita so didn't have the clue. AI-generated images are hot right now and it looks like many others; they likely saw it in passing and liked it enough to comment.

To address some other comments, AI image generation isn't "stealing" just because it's trained on your work. It's making new works inspired by it. Would you hate people for making works inspired by your work? The AI is doing the same thing.

Content warning: Aiart / opinion

This entry was edited (1 year ago)

David Revoy reshared this.

that's not my intention. I'm not equating those. People are conscious, emotional beings, while AI currently are not. There may be ethical issues w/scraping publicly posted data but that's a separate issue from what I was saying. That said, people can view the images, do analysis and use it for inspiration, so why can't AI?

The real problem as I see it is that it lowers the value of such work. That is an unfortunate downside but it's often the cost of progress from new tech.

Content warning: re: Aiart / opinion

@Tanath My 0.02€: I don't see a fundamental difference between a human artist's brain receiving inputs from what the person can see while looking at other artist's *published* creations, and an AI being fed the same creations although the AI will need a lot more inputs to learn than the human can do (AIs are still very inefficient at learning).

The morality issue starts when the user asks the AI “make a picture like David Revoy's”.
Maybe an “AI-not-welcome” licence may help?
Thingos of the bird site 😜.

Sorry for the joke, but here we know you too well to make this comments.

Hugs!
@marcelcosta Thanks! And it's true it never happened here. 🥰
Getting to this point didn't take long at all...
reply with a ChatGPT answer.
Answer the question?
(message including the indicator of tone)
Oh, I did it, but it was rather polite and first degree, I'm sure it's disappointing compare to all the talent and humor I read from the replies to my post.

I wrote:

"
Thanks, but I don't use any A.I. It's a painting, from scratch.

I'm against the way the databases for training the model were built without the artists' consent.
"
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
whoops, my message was meant to be a subtle joke, but I guess I was too subtle about it. Either way I like this answer, thanks
I really wonder how we, as human beings, will handle this AI augmented future. I expect it will often make us think about how we evaluate certain things. For example: Do we like a painting because its pretty? because it tells a story? because it inspires our imagination? or maybe because of its history? how it was created or by whom? Humans have always built tools to extend their abilities and to overcome their limitations but how long will it take to get used to these new tools?

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (2)

David Revoy reshared this.

@sepia everyone's data eventually will get scraped so I'm not worried about that. I don't even bother to check if mines were being scrapped.

Just do the thing you do, ai doesnt have the personality and the life experiences to make the same thing you make

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (3)

This entry was edited (1 year ago)

David Revoy reshared this.

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (3)

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (2)

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (2)

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (2)

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (2)

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (2)

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (2)

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (2)

@lonelyowl In general I have to agree. A fundamental technique of our species is to learn by copying and no copyright law can, will or should ever prevent that.
Now the way these AI systems are trained is obviously not ok either, especially if companies make an effort to remove watermarks, deliberately ignore the rights of creators and sell the result.
The question is where do we draw the line? Would it be ok to train a system on photos of protected art? When is the result unique?
@sepia
If you stop thinking in terms of intelligence chauvinism, implying that machine learning is fundamentally (not technically) different from human learning, you may find that countless words have already been written about the originality of art and the nature of plagiarism, and much of it is already built into our copyright laws.

If the machine itself is able to separate the watermark from the drawing during the learning process, then there seems to be no reasonable way to prevent it from doing so, since I can do the same.

Artists frequently participating in various holywars about who stole what from who involving humans only (i dislike them btw, but now it's not about that), applying the same logic to ai generated art will be much less inadequate than trying to prevent fair use.
@sepia
Also, would be interesting to ask if activision blizzard legally able to take down sakimichan's (or other same kind of artist) patreon for using their protected by copyright characters to accrue money 🤔
@lonelyowl It's a topic I know a bit as a free culture advocate, I wrote a full conference about the problems with fan-art years ago (for LibrePlanet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvtcHAMsQp4 ). Yes, commercial fan-arts are all under the fair use of companies. They could ask for removal at any moment and engage law-suit too. But it would be very unpopular with the fan base. So, it's a balance the companies learned (or not) to find.
Commercial AI will face same challenge, eg. https://lexica.art/?q=star+war

@sepia
@lonelyowl hahaha, did Disney comment on this already? 😅🙈
@sepia

Probably the best solution would be to apply copyright to final result of generation process based on how generated picture is going to be used (commercially or not) instead of moderating dataset.
@lonelyowl Maybe, a bit like the 'contentID' curates Youtube or other large social media, yes, I can see that coming eventually.

@sepia

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (2)

someone has never seen the faces generated in AI art before
Je comprends 😞

Remarque j'ai faillit la faire sur celle du dragon, mais je me suis ravisé, c'est une mauvaise blague.
@marnic Merci.
Je pense que j'ai posté cette copie d'écran et réaction sincèrement ressentie car c'est la goutte d'eau qui a fait un peu déborder mon vase... J'étais resté bien silencieux sur ce sujet jusque là. Sans doute trop.

Alors que oui, ça peut être une blague, ou un troll commun de l'air du temps, ou une question légitime des temps qui arrivent et j'ai pris ça a coeur...

Bon après, si il y aurait eu un smiley, ça serait 100x mieux passé en blague.😉
J'avais posté ça il y a quelques jours
https://framapiaf.org/@marnic/109489021372748775
Car en tant qu'amateur d'art et d'art numérique le déversement de toutes ces images généré en 2 clics m'énerve de plus en plus.
@marnic Ha oui, en effet. Oui, Bien vue.
Je pense que ça sera le groupe le plus enclin à des comportements protecteurs, sincère et/ou éthique de préciser par un hashtag la nature des oeuvres.
Je pense que "humanart" ou similaire risque de prendre de la traction, car les autres imposeront leur aiart comme normalité et feront tout pour noyer ça ni vue ni connue.
Comme de la fausse monnaie qui vient dévaluer un marché.
Il faut que je me fasse à ce mot clef + partager des vidéos/process.
God I cannot wait for this to die off
autocorrect can really mangle a sentence

"Cool witch! What did you use for this?"

If they followed you, they'd know it was most likely Krita
I thought A.I. ripping off our software (via github auto pilot) was bad enough. But it looks like it is even worse for artists. At least nobody was asking programmers: ”which A.I. engine wrote your program”.
@tannerspaw Same, I wish a model existed trained exclusively on CC-0 and Public Domain resources.

@chengdulittlea@sepia
@Gavy@Vilrax Ha, ben ça m'interesse aussi pour le coup si j'ai un concepteur. J'ai une assez grande liste de bug-report sur mes biais et ce *#@! de corps. Assez pour me demander si j'étais pas un projet fait le vendredi soir sur un coin table après un pot de départ un peu trop arrosé et publié à la hâte avant de partir en vacances. 😆
@Gavy Au bout d'un moment, va falloir aller vérifier si @davidrevoy ne serait pas un androïde spécialisé dans l'art.
You can tell it isn't AI art because it doesn't use the same boring blue orange color scheme that all AI art seems to use.
@wekeys Autant le "ton métier ne sert plus à rien.", je comprends, et comme c'est mon métier, je prend ça au sens large. Mais la seconde partie est assez violente et plus pour ma pomme: "va te vendre", "sur Twitch", "react cringe" ... Je t'ai fait du mal par le passé ou je me fais une idée?
@fartkart Oh, I did. It's just not on the screenshot. But you know, you'll be disappointed by what I really answered because I was polite and all.
I wrote:
"
Thanks, but I don't use any A.I. It's a painting, from scratch.

I'm against the way the databases for training the model were built without the artists' consent.
"
i call cap. this looks like an ai trained image
@fartkart Even if I have a proof it is not? https://framapiaf.org/@davidrevoy/109513537083560213

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (3)

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (3)

Content warning: Aiart / opinion (3)

maybe it was because that one time you said you was usiing it
@xarvos Oh yes, in September I was very excited by it and enthusiast, you remember it well. (src https://framapiaf.org/@davidrevoy/108969346357981937 ) but that was before tool like https://haveibeentrained.com/ confirmed the model was trained with the work of artists (mine included, fully). It changed my appreciation of the tool a lot. I wish a model existed with only CC-0 and Public Domain photo/art/clipart...
@wekeys
Hello
Perso je lis ce post comme du cynisme de situation, une illustration d'une tendance globale qui, comme un personnage, dirait cela et avec cette violence.
Donc rien de personnel.
Le personnel on le trouve dans le fait que l'auteur choisi ton post initial, le personnel est donc une belle 'embrassade' d'empathie qui partage le "tired" de ton post initial.
😉
:shibasparklyeyes:
apparemment il y a des artistes qui jouent à tromper les bots https://wandering.shop/@Nezchan/109515222808624385
@fredenbois Yes, if you scroll https://www.artstation.com 's frontpage, you'll see plenty of it because of the popular AI prompt "Trending on Artstation". I also uploaded one to my artstation old dusty account https://www.artstation.com/deevad .
@Gavy@Vilrax y a quelques framaprojets qui ont commencé comme ca, c'est pas déconnant
ufff... Why can't trolls just shut up for a moment, or two, or better forever?
« My brain, my hands and some pièce of software used to pain » ?
@Gavy:blobglare: mmm... nmnmnmnnen smomtdmno ... Aïe mes yeux. Je crois que je vais me resservir un café ☕ :blobreach: @Vilrax
@wekeys@bubar@alicesutaren ☺️ Je comprends mieux, merci !
@kookie Hey, I run an open-source webcomic where all material are downloadable in free access and under an open license. You'll find the 4K wallpaper in a post I published later: https://framapiaf.org/@davidrevoy/109513537083560213 (and if you want a print, I can upload the design on my Redbubble shop).

My main income is made with patronage and online donation. If you want and can support my quest to continue to make art this way , you'll find on https://www.peppercarrot.com/en/support/ all the options (Patreon/Liberapay/Bank/Paypal)🎁 .
It's really sad to see that. Unfortunately, this seems to be a future of art and artists... Stay strong !
@kookie Thank you! No it doesn't punish me. On Patreon, I'm not using it 'per month', but 'per webcomic creation', and I post rarely a new episode (one every three or four months). So, I'll not impact much your budget. In best case, the new episode should come at the end of February.
C'est triste… Mais en prenant du recul, c'est aussi un drôle de compliment.

D'un point de vue historique, cela me fait penser au remplacement des peintres par la photographie, puis les photographes par la photo numérique, etc. Il y en a toujours, mais moins 😋

Courage !
🤣🤣🤣 pauvres âmes
@matthieu 🤣 the “AI creates like humans do” is an ideology that belong for me in the same pack of:

- Religious: "This is a holy book that gods have written".

- Economist: "There is an invisible hand that balance the free market".

- Youtube: "It's not our moderation decision, but the one of the algorithm"

- AI "It's not us who stole the img data; but the AI who gets inspired and think by itself"

The bow to our invisible 'superior entity almighty'.

Not for me. 😆

@gigantos@Tanath
@gigantos@Tanath
Theft of image data would deprive you of it, this is not the case, despite what the propaganda from music labels and film studios has been hammering for years.

Regarding creation, I believe (until proven wrong or told that the problem is ill-defined) that one does not know whether the processus of creation of humans or AI is similar or different. I try to refrain from claiming it's either, until I have more information.
@matthieu
if you browse the Stable Diffusion paper, you'll see it's only a complex overlay of image + synthesis. This example is from the paper:

https://ommer-lab.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/article-Figure16-1.png

Seeing in that a new form of life that need same privilege than human about copyright is −Imo− pure ideology ( called posthumanism/AI TakeOver I think ).

It's not because the trick is complex that this machine 'think'. If it would be, the problem of 6 fingers rendering would be not one. 🤣

@gigantos@Tanath
@gigantos@Tanath Where did I write “new form of life”? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

But your remark about the copyright privilege is interesting: who should be the legal entity held responsible w.r.t. copyright? The human training the AI? The AI (probably not)? The user of the AI? I guess the question is similar for online meme generators (pictures taken from wherever with an overlay of text created by the user of the tool). Is there any legal decision on those?
@matthieu You didn't wrote that. Sorry 😉 That was a caricature. Just one I couldn't resist after reading too many comments, I think I got just too many feedback over the last 24h and I don't think well now.

Yes, the responsibility of AI copyright is an interesting case. I'll see what people harvest from the recent provocation of Disney copyright ( like https://vmst.io/@selzero/109512557990367884 )

@gigantos@Tanath
You didn't answer the question.

Which one ? 👺
It sucks, it doesn't even use the blockchain
@gigantos@Tanath I thought more about the copyright and AI.
If you consider that the training of an AI is like looking at published pictures (i.e. meant to be looked at), then it's the person who uses the AI as a tool to generate a new, derivative, inspired-by-what-it-has-seen picture who is responsible for respecting copyright law. Just like a person who is inspired by another artist is responsible if it produces something that looks too much like an original work.
De toute façon, on a déjà trouvé les limites de l'A.I art : l'erreur humaine ! 😁
source : https://creapills.com/bescherelle-orthographe-intelligence-artificielle-20221215
ah sad times, is this the default comment for artwork these days? How very tragic.
@Timkongart Yes, it looks like I'll probably get more replies like that in the future. I wrote a ...

🚫 No NFTs
🚫 No A.I.

... in my Bio, maybe it will help the commenters to know it is now highly unrealistic I used any A.I. engine in my art. I'll see if it prevents anything.
@matthieu Except in case of a person, you can't prove the source of inspiration, you can't open the brain and see the picture stored somewhere to legally prove it was used. It might a coïncidence, a re-creation, etc... In case of a computer and “an advanced photo mixer software generating potential derivations based on statistical probability", it's possible to prove legally. The Concept Art Association is starting a fundraiser to start a lawsuit, btw https://www.gofundme.com/f/protecting-artists-from-ai-technologies

@gigantos@Tanath
@gigantos@Tanath So you claim that it's possible to take a trained AI and find the original images in it? The way I understand neural nets, I doubt that very much.

The lawsuit seems to want to discriminate between humans who watch the source images and get inspired by it and software doing the same (but on an industrial scale). So it fights against the industrialization of the process, right?
@matthieu Yes. The image are dataset provided by LAION. LAION makes triage (remove watermarks, pr0n, infringing picture). You can get the set here https://laion.ai/blog/laion-5b/ , it's the one that train model for Midjourney/Dall-E and Stable Diffusion.
Website like https://haveibeentrained.com/ are new services returning if your art is part of the Laion dataset (or other).
It's just a big database of URL + description.

@gigantos@Tanath
@gigantos@Tanath Ah. The dataset is not the neural net. The dataset is a list of annotated images to look at. Conceptually not much different (except in size) from e.g. a Mastodon user who boosts others' pictures for everyone to see.

But as the dataset effectively contains images that LAION probably has no permission to redistribute, it would indeed breaks the law. But let's be accurate: the point of contention is the redistribution of the training set, not the AI.
@matthieu Yes, totally.I'm all ok with AI if they were trained on Public Domain material. Many tools (already in Photoshop, a smart lasso tool, a sky replacer, a background extractor) already use trained model to do some job faster and more accurately, and with a dataset that Adobe research had permission.It's OK.

The real issue is with getting −without my consent− 10 times my Alice in Wonderland CG Award illustration on LAION-5B, training all AI 😔

https://rom1504.github.io/clip-retrieval/?back=https%3A%2F%2Fknn5.laion.ai&index=laion5B&useMclip=false&imageUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F236x%2Fb3%2Fc5%2F23%2Fb3c5235c3016ebe0e16d6492d1cba88d--cheshire-cat-art-alice-liddell.jpg

@gigantos@Tanath
"I've been training this neuronal model for seven years straight but it is not generating the expected output" sounds so much more exciting than "my kid is now seven and acts up"
I could never get my head around these people who just cannot seem to realize that there's actually people with skills who make stuff…

It's just too far removed from baseline reality for my brain to acknowledge people can actually think like that. Like, who do these people imagine is actually creating all this stuff?

In hindsight, it seems only natural that these people would now start to assume everything is done by an AI just because they can't do that particular thing. :/
Soon a new "Natural Intelligence" label to guarantee organic images and texts? :}
@lertsenem Seriously yes, I adopted the hashtag #humanart this week. 😐 It feels weird to have to mention that now.
Thoughts and prayers, David, thoughts and prayers.
did he mean Adobe Illustrator?
@morph Hey, yes, good memory 👍 The links are part of the 'process' post: https://framapiaf.org/@davidrevoy/109513537083560213
@salvaterra

I … I … I do not have enough middle fingers to properly respond to that.
Who sent this? I just want to talk...
@Homebrewandhacking Sorry, I'll not help to identify the account and that's why I blured their name and replaced the avatar with a default... I try to prevent doxing as much as I can.
I just wanted to show that for us, artists, we are now in this new era where this type of question is common.
If you want to discuss with AIArt enthusiasts, you'll find many after exploring the right hashtags here.
I'm not an AI art enthusiast. Thanks.

I'd love a better tool to help artists but, in my limited understanding, it draws on artists copyrighted material to create things.

I'd love a tool that was trained on public domain art because I'd like stock art that wasn't pale, male and male gazey because in my niche, bootstrapping is a real problem.