@Montag I think it'd be good if when publishing comments to masto that it adds a #
nsfw tag, if that means images are hidden...
I think that images should also remain hidden in a post with an abstract.
What I'd really love to see is for our markup to look more like this:
[abstract txt="This is the 1st CW message"]
This is the text that is protected
[img ...]This image is not shown unless the user chooses[/img]
[/abstract]
This text is not protected
[abstract txt="This is the 2nd CW message"]
This is more text that is protected
[img ...]This image is not shown unless the user chooses[/img]
[/abstract]
This would allow one to compose a post with multiple CW sections, each of which could be shown / hidden independently, including any images inside the
[abstract] tags.
I realise not all instances will understand this markup, but presumably it could be translated for each instance, as the post is generated for sending, so:
* A masto instance might receive:
[abstract]This is the 1st CW message[/abstract]
#nsfw
This is the text that is protected
[img ...]This image is not shown unless the user chooses[/img]
This text is not protected
This is more text that is protected
[img ...]This image is not shown unless the user chooses[/img]
And thus only show only the first abstract and nothing else unless the user chooses to.
* A friendica node would receive it unmodified, and allow the user to selectively show / hide each block protected by its
[abstract] tag.
etc.
