Skip to main content


I studied Artificial Intelligence for four years, and I am not touching LLM AIs with a ten-foot pole.

It's not really about the insane electricity demands, the water usage, tho that's a good reason. It's not even, if I'm honest, about the disastrous effect on the sum of all human art and knowledge.

It's because a) I've studied enough AI to know it's a trick, a sort of linguistic illusion, and b) I've studied enough everything else to understand that I'm not immune to such illusions.

Do you know stage magicians say that more educated people are easier to fool, not less?

I think about that a lot.

LLMs are the perfect yes-men, giving the user exactly what they expect to see, making them feel clever and special.

When studying my degree I came up with all these tricks to distinguish in a Turing test whether I was talking to a real intelligence or a fake one. I'm no longer certain I couldn't be charmed into thinking the AI had passed these when it hadn't.

I often use this when trying to explain LLMs to people

#AI #LLM #OhNoWereGonnaNeedAnotherTimmy

Joseph Fink @planetoffinks.bsky.social 22h
¢. It turns out this whole time that the Turing
Test was the wrong way to think of it.
Thinking a chatbot is alive is not a test of
how good the chatbot is, but of your own
ability to think of other human beings as real
and complete people

Greg Stolze @gregstolze.bsky.social 11h
"I heard some professor put googly eyes on
a pencil and waved it at his class saying "HI!
I'm Tim the pencil! | love helping children
with their homework but my favorite is
drawing pictures!"
Then, without warning, he snapped the pencil
in half.

 Greg Stolze
.  (@gregstolze.bsky.social
When half his college students gasped,
he said "THAT'S where all this Al
hype comes from. We're not good at
programming consciousness. But we're
GREAT at imagining non-concious things
are people.”
2/2