Skip to main content
This disgruntled police officer unintentionally laid down exactly what would #DefundThePolice look like. A drastic reduction in mission scope down to the strictly necessary violence. Any other calls they mention could be handled by unarmed civil servants.

pinkprius [en]

2020-06-10 15:45:51


hmmmmmmmm
A police officers post: Id demand that we not respond to non emergency calls. No house parties, no neighbor disputes, no landlord tenant disputes, no homeless trespassing calls, no traffic stops, and no traffic collisions. Basically I'm only responding to emergency calls with armed suspects and only containing until I have the world with me. Why expose myself and my partner to any possible altercation where we are found liable. I'm not getting paid like a doctor or lawyer so that with reduced pay and requiring private insurance good luck getting anything done. <br>User birdwaves replies: That is specifically, explicitly what the people want. Thank you in advance for your service o7
#DefundThePolice @pinkprius [en]
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗹 𝗚𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗲́
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗹 𝗚𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗲́  
Firefighter: I'm not responding to any calls for emergencies unless it's a fire and even then, I want proof that things are actually on fire, real fire, not back yard BBQs or small blazes. Thing have got to be going to hell first, and then I want military grade backup, cause I'm not risking my life doing non-actual-big-fire stuff, especially if I don't get to occasionally beat the shit out of people.
⇧