Identifying with my birth sex the way cisgender people would? Absolutely not, everything I learned around it was an act, much like the billion other acts I had to learn in ABA to pass myself off as halfway normal to society at large. I've only felt like I actually have something grounded I can identify with since I realized I was trans.
Agreed. Once I let the government of canada know that I was no longer a male, and was now an Omega Metroid (pronouns are Screech/X), it was like a load of weight was taken off my shoulders, and I could live my life the way I've been wanting to: by draining the life force everything I interact with. #Solidarity :trans_heart:
> CNN isn't mentioning MI or GA anymore, so they must be doing good! Don't, worry, Hadassah. You're gonna see the screenshots before the 21st of January. I know you're impatient, but you'll just have to wait. #TrustThePlan #JewsForQ
Hey, didn't we have this conversation the other day, when I told you no, because I don't have the appropriate yarmulke to wear in order to be sufficiently afraid of being wrong to do something stupid like that. Do you have one I could borrow?
How come you brought Trump up in a conversation about Trans rights? That sounds like a salty stalkpost to the rest of the class.
I don't think Mew likes that I'm Trans, and that I got a government to recognize it. You, however, are a known TERF mad because Biden lost, not respecting a single safe space that you can't be a member of.
> like So you're not sure if it's fucking hilarious? That would make sense, because you didn't watch the news today and still think Biden won. I bet that cognitive dissonance hurt. :sticker_hatkid: #TrustThePlan #LOLBidenLost
Trump supporters in 2020 = Hillary supporters in 2016. So what did they do in 2016? The clamored on about impeachment for the next 4 years and cockblocked every law of his. So that's the next step for the magas
Because you partizan retards were so triggered by the current president that you made democracy impossible. And I'm going to fully back republicans doing the same shit this term
if it was purely partisan than why did mitt impeach him too? stop claiming reciprocity, they aren't remotely equivalent. just say "i'm a butthurt loser and want to see the winner punished".
also does he ignore what Republicans did to Obama? (yes)
like seriously, these Republicans get selective amnesia. in a time of great crisis, McConnell's number one priority was ensuring Obama lost re-election (meaning, he'd be inclined to sabotage the economy, block programs, etc, to make Obama look ineffective)
It was gay, yes. But the vote for obama's senator went down "fairly" due to a republican senate majority. Pretend this didn't happen, and also pretend that the dems controlled the senate when ACB was getting nominated. Are you saying that they wouldn't have blocked her? It has nothing to do with tit for tat, the dems are just so butthurt over trump they happen to use that as an excuse
And note that with obama's justice *he still tried*. Republicans said it wasn't fair to have a justice in your last year (and I agree that's BS), but he TRIED. So trump had the full right to try his. And his worked.
> But the vote for obama's senator went down "fairly" due to a republican senate majority.
So? If Democrats had a majority you would've been fine with them blocking it? You would've said it was fair? I don't think so.
> Pretend this didn't happen, and also pretend that the dems controlled the senate when ACB was getting nominated. Are you saying that they wouldn't have blocked her?
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Republicans started the precedent of "block supreme court nominees", so Democrats only wanted them to apply the rules they said should apply fairly.
Yes, Trump had the right to try his justice. That doesn't mean Republicans aren't hypocrites here.
there was nothing wrong with Democrats opposing Trump, especially given that Trump didn't win the popular vote.
"we should work with the guy who the majority of Americans do not support to help enact policies we do not support" is... quite a dumb take for you to expect Democrats to have.
That's just dems seething and they're using the "muh popular vote" as a means to discredit him. But you're young, inexperienced, and generally don't understand politics, so I'll explain why we use the EC.
Imagine if the world was a singular nation, and we voted on a leader. China's got 3B people, so essentially every single time we have an election, it's up to china. Is it fair for china, their single continent, to decide how every continent should be run? Can they possibly understand the needs of people in places like Austrailia? No, they can't.
So should a bunch of sheltered city fuckers all of a sudden decide the needs of country folk? If that were the case, they'd all get fucked because the candidates would simply stop caring about them. Why concern yourself with the needs of middle america when all you need is the city vote? Why bother appealing to americans when you just gotta make china happy to get elected?
my argument is "Democrats don't need to further someone's agenda that's unpopular across the nation and in their states"
I know why we pick the president the way we do. And no, it has nothing to do with concerns about 21st century rural America and everything to do with overrepresenting the south. A straight popular vote would make regions that suppress their voters count less than those that don't.
The system we have for making sure the needs of all regions of the country are met is called representative democracy. That's why there are these things called "congresspeople".
Also, why should country folk matter more than those in cities? Your state has a lower GDP per capita than every blue state besides (relatively rural) Maine and New Mexico - you contribute less economically to the nation than Democrats do so you getting more representation is absurd.
I've lived through the whole gore thing, I've literally seen every argument against the EC get shot down, hence why it stayed after that fiasco. But oh ho ho, these zoomers read some shit on Reddit and all of a sudden think they know better than what the entire nation just agreed upon two decades ago
two decades lol. the electoral college was not established two decades ago. and the reason it wasn't abolished is that the side that won... was in power. so of course they're not gonna abolish the only thing that gave them that power.
> Pelosi and Schumer aren't the reason I don't have another stimulus cheque! > Pelosi and Schumer didn't shut down the government in order to fight a battle they lost over the wall! > Pelosi and Schumer didn't try to impeach for a perfect call to Ukraine! Did you know the average liberal only has 3 weeks of history buffered in RAM? Anything older than that is dangerous to keep around, because it'd get in the way of the new programming you receive.
i actually agree with you on this one. they should've accepted the larger deal the republicans eventually offered. minus the bullshit corporate immunity.
Trump literally wrote the book on deal making. Pelosi said "nope", and then convinced everyone it was Trump's fault. Then you came in here parroting it. @georgia@icedquinn@allison@cirno@mewmew
> I haven't read the book, therefore I can state strongly what parts he didn't write! > I can't even see the parallels in how he negotiates with foreign leaders! We can tell. But you read an article once about the book's ghostwriter, so you call yourself informed.
lol, did I just make another direct hit over the target? The lesbian is actually just hiding massive daddy issues.
Sorry, I don't bang chicks that had plastic surgery. It's like misrepresenting what your kids would look like. Just another trick from your TERF tribe.
promethea
•mewmew
•Shine
•mewmew
•Cryptolibertarian Catgirl
•Anornymorse
•mewmew
•georgia
•Anornymorse
•Not sure what this has to do with being trans, TERF.
@georgia@mewmew@allison
georgia
•Anornymorse
•https://twitter.com/JDRucker/status/1331852753186947072
georgia
•Anornymorse
•Don't, worry, Hadassah. You're gonna see the screenshots before the 21st of January. I know you're impatient, but you'll just have to wait. #TrustThePlan #JewsForQ
@georgia@allison@mewmew
georgia
•Anornymorse
•How come you brought Trump up in a conversation about Trans rights? That sounds like a salty stalkpost to the rest of the class.
georgia
•Anornymorse
•Come back when your HRT gives you roid clit.
georgia
•i mean you're here saying i'm butthurt biden lost. like that's fucking hilarious.
Anornymorse
•So you're not sure if it's fucking hilarious? That would make sense, because you didn't watch the news today and still think Biden won. I bet that cognitive dissonance hurt. :sticker_hatkid: #TrustThePlan #LOLBidenLost
georgia
•kay boomer
Anornymorse
•It's fun to be able to milk salt from a TERF. Thanks.
@georgia@allison@mewmew
georgia
•Cirno 🌸
•mewmew
•And you guys had unified control of the government for two years and still couldn't get shit done.
Cirno 🌸
•georgia
•stop claiming reciprocity, they aren't remotely equivalent. just say "i'm a butthurt loser and want to see the winner punished".
mewmew
•which is not a philosophy we need in government.
georgia
•mewmew
•also does he ignore what Republicans did to Obama? (yes)
like seriously, these Republicans get selective amnesia. in a time of great crisis, McConnell's number one priority was ensuring Obama lost re-election (meaning, he'd be inclined to sabotage the economy, block programs, etc, to make Obama look ineffective)
www.tevitroy.org/8245/mcconnell-under-fire
Cirno 🌸
•And note that with obama's justice *he still tried*. Republicans said it wasn't fair to have a justice in your last year (and I agree that's BS), but he TRIED. So trump had the full right to try his. And his worked.
mewmew
•So? If Democrats had a majority you would've been fine with them blocking it? You would've said it was fair? I don't think so.
> Pretend this didn't happen, and also pretend that the dems controlled the senate when ACB was getting nominated. Are you saying that they wouldn't have blocked her?
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Republicans started the precedent of "block supreme court nominees", so Democrats only wanted them to apply the rules they said should apply fairly.
Yes, Trump had the right to try his justice. That doesn't mean Republicans aren't hypocrites here.
Cirno 🌸
•mewmew
•mewmew
•there was nothing wrong with Democrats opposing Trump, especially given that Trump didn't win the popular vote.
"we should work with the guy who the majority of Americans do not support to help enact policies we do not support" is... quite a dumb take for you to expect Democrats to have.
Cirno 🌸
•Imagine if the world was a singular nation, and we voted on a leader. China's got 3B people, so essentially every single time we have an election, it's up to china. Is it fair for china, their single continent, to decide how every continent should be run? Can they possibly understand the needs of people in places like Austrailia? No, they can't.
So should a bunch of sheltered city fuckers all of a sudden decide the needs of country folk? If that were the case, they'd all get fucked because the candidates would simply stop caring about them. Why concern yourself with the needs of middle america when all you need is the city vote? Why bother appealing to americans when you just gotta make china happy to get elected?
mewmew
•I know why we pick the president the way we do. And no, it has nothing to do with concerns about 21st century rural America and everything to do with overrepresenting the south. A straight popular vote would make regions that suppress their voters count less than those that don't.
The system we have for making sure the needs of all regions of the country are met is called representative democracy. That's why there are these things called "congresspeople".
Also, why should country folk matter more than those in cities? Your state has a lower GDP per capita than every blue state besides (relatively rural) Maine and New Mexico - you contribute less economically to the nation than Democrats do so you getting more representation is absurd.
Anornymorse
•Bruh. Too many big words.
@cirno@mewmew@allison@georgia
Cirno 🌸
•mewmew
•Anornymorse
•> Pelosi and Schumer didn't shut down the government in order to fight a battle they lost over the wall!
> Pelosi and Schumer didn't try to impeach for a perfect call to Ukraine!
Did you know the average liberal only has 3 weeks of history buffered in RAM? Anything older than that is dangerous to keep around, because it'd get in the way of the new programming you receive.
@mewmew@cirno@allison@georgia
mewmew
•They really aren't, though. Democrats have passed a stimulus through the house, blame the Republicans for not passing it through the senate.
> Pelosi and Schumer didn't shut down the government in order to fight a battle they lost over the wall!
I thought Mexico was paying for the wall? Even accepting your story here, which is untrue - they were just holding Trump to his word.
> Pelosi and Schumer didn't try to impeach for a perfect call to Ukraine!
Perfect call lmfao you're hopeless.
Q.U.I.N.N.
•they asked for a lot of unrelated shit in a bill that should have been 100% support for private citizens. businesses should have received flat zeroes.
georgia
•Anornymorse
•georgia
•Anornymorse
•> I can't even see the parallels in how he negotiates with foreign leaders!
We can tell. But you read an article once about the book's ghostwriter, so you call yourself informed.
@georgia@allison@cirno@icedquinn@mewmew
georgia
•Anornymorse
•We know. That's why we're mocking you.
@georgia@allison@cirno@icedquinn@mewmew
georgia
•Anornymorse
•Three of us in in here making you dance right now. But keep pointing the gun at me, yolanda.
@georgia @allison @cirno @icedquinn @mewmew
georgia
•Q.U.I.N.N.
•georgia
•Anornymorse
•@georgia@icedquinn@allison@cirno@mewmew
georgia
•Anornymorse
•Sorry, I don't bang chicks that had plastic surgery. It's like misrepresenting what your kids would look like. Just another trick from your TERF tribe.
@georgia@allison@cirno@icedquinn@mewmew
georgia
•"lol u Jew"
"lol u (((TERF)))"
"lol u gay"
mewmew
•