Skip to main content
I love every piece that considers copyright and Mickey Mouse, so this one is obviously a great one: Jon Stokes, in Reason, shows how generative AI poses a challenge for studios like Disney. And highlights a current effort to make generative AI models - in their current form - illegal, as forms of infringing derivative works. #copyright #generativeAI #MickeyMouse

https://reason.com/2023/01/19/dont-let-disney-monopolize-a-i-generated-art/

Don't Let Disney Monopolize A.I.-Generated Art

The indie artists suing Stable Diffusion may not realize it, but they're doing the Mouse's dirty work.
Jon Stokes (Reason Magazine)
#copyright #generativeAI #MickeyMouse
MiKlo:~/citizen4.eu$💙💛
MiKlo:~/citizen4.eu$💙💛  
•
@Alek Will it be not a coincidence that, if someone has money for lawyers (a big corpo), the generative AI corpo will "teach" the model to filter input and output or pay part of its profits, and if someone has no money, it will cease to be necessary as soon as the AI "learns" his/her style to copy it later (for free, without any attribution) and make money from it.
@Alek
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
⇧