Skip to main content


I already hate plausible deniability in politicians' speech, but nothing irks me more than when it involves "child sex abuse protection" to peddle a wide net #surveillance apparatus.

This time it's the EU, but the fallacy "if you're against surveillance, you're for child sex abuse" has been successfully used in the US as well.

#chatcontrol is an EU plan to spy in real time on *all* your communication, including encrypted messengers like Signal. Let me put it bluntly: If the state doesn't trust me, I will never trust the state. This is unacceptable. Period.
We all know that e2ee is not possible on Mobile devices.... I predict services in countries where you upload text in one encryption and you will get returned the encryption that is different. And then they will hack those services too
Could not agree more, @Hypolite Petovan This is the default fallback on why we should give up our #privacy protections. Funny they don't want the same logic applied to other things like, gun control, regulation of the financial sector, etc. . .
⇧