Skip to main content


To imply that every human interaction is a value transaction is to reduce the human experience to a spreadsheet.

#blockchain
Our brains are kind of a soficiticated computer. So making parallels to software like spreadsheets to explain how we make decisions has its merits.

You should read "Human Action" by Mises. It would illustrate why every monetary transaction is a value transaction.
"The Virtue of selfishness" by Ayan Rand would explain exactly why every transaction is a value transaction AND a moral decision.
Our brains are nothing like computers. Memory is perpetually reconstructed, there’s no central processing unit, no hard disk, no keyboard, no network connectivity, what are you talking about?

And Ayn Rand was wrong about pretty much everything. 🗑
to be honest I cannot imagine another futuristic way to solve enequality. We are already measuring advantages and disadvantages of people and try to equalize the system based on the “data”. Think of gevernmental supports or progressive income taxes. But we still have loads of enequality, not only because we don’t agree on common morals but also don’t have a sophisticated way to measure all the complexities of enequality.
There still are loads of inequality because people who take country-level decisions are fine with it, nothing more. We aren’t lacking tools, we’re lacking the will.