A bit off track, but I think I'm allowed to mention it here in context: I read about the proposal to stop calling people here users and to start calling them people. In fact, drug addicts are also called users. Let's be more human.

I am a user (here and now) and I feel 100% human. "User" is not an identity, it is a contextual role of someone operating the platform, while not having/using administrative privileges.
Furthermore, there are profiles that cannot be designated as "people": multiperson accounts, various personas / aspects of an individual, bots, and - eventually - AI-driven identities.
So to me, "user" is acceptable, and "profile" is even better.

Having said that, I believe someone can provide an addon, allowing site admin to modify wording as they please. That would be a solution in a truly decentralized spirit. At least for English language version.
I am not certain how complex it would be for German, Polish, or other fusional languages.

@Signor Amministratore@Ji Fu@Free Software Foundation I can only agree with this. I was a supporter of open source software for years. But I don't know anything about coding. I was able to report from the user's point of view what I found good about the software, what features there were, etc. I noticed that developers often found this interesting. Because first of all they are potential users themselves. Because as users they have a double interest in contributing as developers.